
Wednesday session in Camden
The online home of Jeremy Keith, an author and web developer living and working in Brighton, England.
Managing Editor: Jeremy Keith
Webmaster: Jeremy Keith
Wednesday session in Camden
Hosting UX London
Tuesday session in London
I really like the thinking behind this project:
We believe computers should work for people, and dream of a future where computing, like cooking or word processing, is available to everyone. Where you can solve your own small, unique problems with small, unique apps. Where you don’t just rely on mass-market apps made by expert programmers. Where you share home-made little apps with family and friends.
Scrappy is our contribution to this dream.
The last three trad sessions I played in were in three different countries—Sunday in Cork, Tuesday in Brighton, Wednesday in Amsterdam—lovely tunes each time!
💜
It’s literally three minutes into CSS Day and I’ve already learned about some CSS I didn’t know about.
Wednesday session in Amsterdam
Going to Amsterdam. brb
It feels awfully retrograde to me that the season finalés of both Andor and Dr. Who depict women staying at home to mind the kids while the dudes go off to work.
Tuesday session
The joy came flooding back to me! It turns out browser APIs are really good now.
Going to Cork, like. brb
In order for principles to truly drive the work and serve as a good framework for the outcomes, they have to be debated, opinionated, and painful.
Yes! Design principles aren’t there to make you feel good; they should provoke arguments.
One of the tests that I’ve developed in thinking through writing down principles, design or otherwise, is to ask the question: “versus what?”.
Engaging with AI as a technology is to play the fool—it’s to observe the reflective surface of the thing without taking note of the way it sends roots deep down into the ground, breaking up bedrock, poisoning the soil, reaching far and wide to capture, uproot, strangle, and steal everything within its reach. It’s to stand aboveground and pontificate about the marvels of this bright new magic, to be dazzled by all its flickering, glittering glory, its smooth mirages and six-fingered messiahs, its apparent obsequiousness in response to all your commands, right up until the point when a sinkhole opens up and swallows you whole.
👏👏👏
Frankly, I’d rather quit my career than live in the future they’re selling. It’s the sheer dystopian drabness of it. Mediocrity as a service.
I tried the tab-completion slot machines; not my cup of tea. I tried image generation and was overcome with literal depression. I don’t want a future as a “prompt artist”.
I’m mostly linking this for what it says, but oh boy, do I love the way it says it with this wonderful HTML web compenent.
Thursday session
goodinternetmagazine.com/close-to-the-metal-web-design-and-the-browser/
It seems like the misguided perception of needing to use complex tools and frameworks to build a website comes from a thinking that web browsers are inherently limited. When, in fact, browsers have evolved to a tremendous degree
I heard you like div
s…
AI is, of course, at the center of this moment. It’s a mediocrity machine by default, attempting to bend everything it touches toward a mathematical average. Using extraordinary amounts of resources, it has the ability to create something good enough, a squint-and-it-looks-right simulacrum of normality. If you don’t care, it’s miraculous.
In the Who Cares Era, the most radical thing you can do is care.
In a moment where machines churn out mediocrity, make something yourself. Make it imperfect. Make it rough. Just make it.
When evaluating any technology I understand why it’s important to ask “how might this benefit me” but it’s more important to first ask “how might this harm others”.
Nice to see Clearleft’s browser support policy get a shoutout from Rachel during her Google IO talk.
Looking at LLM usage and promotion as a cultural phenomenon, it has all of the markings of a status game. The material gains from the LLM (which are usually quite marginal) really aren’t why people are doing it: they’re doing it because in many spaces, using ChatGPT and being very optimistic about AI being the “future” raises their social status. It’s important not only to be using it, but to be seen using it and be seen supporting it and telling people who don’t use it that they’re stupid luddites who’ll inevitably be left behind by technology.
Monday session
If I’m understanding Greg correctly here, he’s saying it’s okay for people to use large language models …because they’re being forced to?
Reading Death of the Author by Nnedi Okorafor.
When someone breezily tells me how they’re using a large language model, I can feel myself channeling Luthen Rael.
“How nice for you” I say, the words seething with contempt.